05-23-2019, 08:43 PM
(05-23-2019, 02:53 PM)GMDino Wrote: Because you complete me. ""
Just got douchechills from that one.
Quote:Oh! So voters "knew" he paid off the pornstar? Weird how the first story about it was January, 2018 then. (Note: Even then DJT denied it ever happened and he had an evolving story until it just that yeah it happened but there was no crime committed.)
Did they all have time machines to read about it and then decide that they didn't care and go back and vote for him?
Ruh roh. The story came out well before 2018, a bit of a wikifail there for you.
Quote:Maybe you meant they all knew he did shady things? Perhaps. Would this incident have been a little different? We'll never know because there was a cover up (there's that phrase again) until after the election.
That he was a philanderer, yes. That's been well known for quite some time.
Quote:Yes....you. One voter.
(Who also apparently owned a time machine?)
This quip didn't age well.
Quote:Not better. Accurate. And less "touch an american nervey" and less "racist implicationsy"
Like I said, I confused being involved in 9/11 with funding terrorists post 9/11. I'm glad you feel better about it.
Quote:Quickly before I answer you (repeated) plea for consistency: They did appeal and the appeals panel said the ruling "went too far" but didn't change anything. FWIW.
https://www.politico.com/blogs/under-the-radar/2010/11/judges-ruling-on-islamic-groups-as-unindicted-co-conspirators-made-public-030922
So let's talk "consistency".
You know, except for the direct quote from a federal judge in the post you responded to.
Quote:In the apple bin we have a case when the one group you brought up is named as unindicted co-conspirators to funnelling money to a terrorist group (Hamas) in a report where there were 300 (yes, bolded for emphasis) unindicted co-conspirators named as possible contributors.
Yeah, they were one of many groups funding terrorism. I'm pleased to see the "everyone else is doing it" defense is alive and well.
Quote:(I'm not defending CAIR. I'm pointing out what the story is.)
While suspiciously sounding like you're defending CAIR. You have a problem with Omar speaking before a group that funded terrorism btw?
Quote:In the orange cart (see what I did there) we have one person who actually did the thing (we have the check and his signature) that he is accused of and where the other guy involved went to jail. While his unindicted co-conspirator is in a position where it is believed he cannot even be indicted.
Bel and I had a very interesting discussion on this, you should look it up.
Quote:And you HAVE defended Trump by saying "voters don't care". Whether he can be indicted or is guilty of something or not...you don't care.
"Consistency"
Don't care about his philandering? Clearly not as they elected him whilst knowing of it.
Quote:In a thread about an investigation into the actions of the sitting POTUS you want to talk about Muslims. Interesting consistency.
Hahaha, look at you tying yourself in knots You know why it got brought up Dino, why be so deliberately disingenuous?
