Question For Pro-Choice People

[Mike M (the other one)]

(05-29-2019, 02:27 PM)Crazyjdawg Wrote: At least they're consistent.

The people who allow for exceptions for rape and incest are the ones who make no sense to me.

Oh, murdering a fetus is unacceptable unless we decide that it isn't the woman's fault that she got pregnant? Then murder is totally fine.

The argument makes no sense, based on the reasoning they claim to be using for why they want to outlaw abortion.

You either believe terminating a pregnancy is murder or you don't. You can't build in loopholes for people you've decided don't deserve to be punished by having a baby they don't want.

No Loophole there, the mother wasn't consenting in rape. Not sure how to classify incest, but those babies are generally born with defects. So I guess it's there to protect the general population?

Anyways, my stance is scientific based. Once the baby has passed gestation and has its own unique DNA code, that is when it is considered a human being to me. It's all part of the human life cycle. Every single one of us goes thru that stage.

Now the "meet in the middle" part says, no abortions allowed after first trimester (unless mother or baby's life is in danger). Which I don't think most of us would have a problem agreeing with simply because almost all abortions happen in the first trimester.