The Mueller Report thread

[jj22]

(05-30-2019, 08:47 PM)Belsnickel Wrote: Shit, I've disliked her since then, as well, and I'm a liberal. There is a reason the Secret Service and military attachment at the White House referred to her as "First *****" during those years. It's sad, because her pedigree and her achievements really would make her a good person to hold such an office, but her personality is one that is less than friendly.


If you had read the Mueller report, you would know that Mueller and his time found no evidence of collusion between Trump's campaign and the Russian government on their attempts to undermine our election.

I've read enough to know that's not true. Enough to know better then to repeat Trumps talking points.

But hey, if the report said that then why is Trump attacking the report still? Claiming conflict of interest in the results? He must not agree with the "No collusion, No obstruction" you guys claim it stated.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-uses-discredited-conflict-of-interest-charges-to-attack-mueller/2019/05/30/2f7c7908-82f6-11e9-95a9-e2c830afe24f_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.d0161a57a468

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-attacks-mueller-true-never-trumper-after-admitting-first-time-n1011861

If you aren't going to read the repot then maybe a dose of common sense will help.

Common sense is enough to figure out if the report said what you said, then Trump wouldn't be attacking it as illegitimate. He'd be highlighting it and pointing to it as proof. Thanking Mueller for clearing and exonerating him.

Not attacking a report that exonerated him as illegitimate. I'm confused as to what you guys are trying to say. Is the report illegitimate as Trump is stating? Thus the "No collusion, No Obstruction" must be a lie.

The report breaks down the evidence and the law, and when it comes to legality you see people not charged all the time for various reasons.

Example.

There is a video of Kraft soliciting sex and getting it by a sex trafficking palor (the true pizzagate that Americans were outraged over when Russian bots spread misinformation about Hillary concerning sex trafficking, yet have ignored when a Republican, Trump, is caught involved in a real one).

He's not charged, so he's able to claim innocence. Patriot fans are able to claim innocence. And everyone gets to ignore the video evidence due to legalities.

Does that make him innocent? Sure. In the court of law. But the court of law forces us to ignore a video that proves a crime was committed.

That's our legal system. A system a jury is told they must ignore a taped confession because someone wasn't read their rights. Leading to a not guilty verdict.

Nobody who read the report would claim Trump was innocent.