More tariffs paid by US consumers

[BmorePat87]

(06-10-2019, 01:16 PM)bfine32 Wrote: I just thought it might qualify as it was a direct response to a post concerning the Mexico Tariffs. of course it is relevant to the OP. That's why i suggested it might be "whataboutisim" and not "derailment". Thanks for the clarification. So many informal rules.

The post doesn't directly mention Mexico. We can infer that the post is referring to the deal worked out with Mexico, but the update doesn't change the OP's criticism of the tariff policy. Mentioning that the deal didn't end all tariffs isn't whataboutism. No "informal rules" that you have to keep track of.