Question For Pro-Choice People

[*bfine32*]

(06-13-2019, 04:54 PM)Belsnickel Wrote: You would have to ask them their reason for language. They also didn't understand how pregnancy began at that time, so maybe that had something to do with it. What I do know is that abortion in British colonies, and in most of the post-colonial states, was legal.


It's not at all that same mentality. Making abortion illegal essentially imprisons women for committing no crime as they give up bodily autonomy. Shall we also pass a law that makes it so any person upon impregnating someone shall refrain from any intoxicating substances, shall induce vomiting for two-weeks each morning, shall be forced to turn up the thermostat in their environment by 20 degrees, carry around 10-50 extra pounds on top of their usual load, and not consume fish or caffeine for the duration of the person's pregnancy?

Last I checked there was the DOI was trying to get us from being a British Colony.

Look who was talking about absurdity. The slippery Slope fallacy is strong in this one. They gave up their bodily autonomy when they allowed someone in it. They freely engaged in the exercise and suffered the consequences. Should we forgive the drunk driver for causing an accident, in which no one was hurt, because he didn't intend to crash or should we hold him accountable for his action?

***WTS, I'm done with this 1,000th thread on abortion. In my 10+ years on the forum I have seen little compromise and I expect to see none here.    



***May reengage to address ad-hominem posts