06-13-2019, 06:01 PM
(06-13-2019, 05:16 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Last I checked there was the DOI was trying to get us from being a British Colony.
Look who was talking about absurdity. The slippery Slope fallacy is strong in this one. They gave up their bodily autonomy when they allowed someone in it. They freely engaged in the exercise and suffered the consequences. Should we forgive the drunk driver for causing an accident, in which no one was hurt, because he didn't intend to crash or should we hold him accountable for his action?
***WTS, I'm done with this 1,000th thread on abortion. In my 10+ years on the forum I have seen little compromise and I expect to see none here.
***May reengage to address ad-hominem posts
My post wasn't a slippery slope. I don't expect anti-abortion laws to lead to those things because patriarchal norms wouldn't go for that. What I am saying is that in order to make things fair with an anti-abortion law, then such a law would be a way to make it so. The person impregnating the other person also did so willingly. If we are forcing one party to endure these things, why can't we allow both? By ignoring that side of things then anti-abortion laws are sexist.
"A great democracy has got to be progressive, or it will soon cease to be either great or a democracy..." - TR
"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." - FDR
"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." - FDR
