War with Iran?

[*bfine32*]

(06-19-2019, 10:18 AM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: You're smarter than this.  Defeating conventional forces is not the same thing as fighting partisans.  To thoroughly defeat partisans you have to engage in activities that would not be tolerated by today's standards of armed conflict.  Regardless, the destruction of Iran's nuclear facilities and ability to make more would be the primary objective.  Reducing their conventional forces to near nil would also be on the table.  Both are well within US ability.


As an aside it is apparently necessary to point out that countering erroneous points made by others on this topic is not analogous to calling for armed conflict with Iran.  These obvious things need to be spelled out on this board for some reason.  This is not directed at you btw, just a general comment.

This was my original assertion and what threw everyone on a tangent. I have also said that our plan after victory is more thought out. Some have either such a disdain for combat or the Commander in Chief that they are willing to claim it would be a stalemate or worse. I've said before: no one hates combat more than those that have witnessed its casualties.

Like you I have made no call to arms, but if it goes that way I have total confidence in the might of our military.