War with Iran?

[Dill]

(06-20-2019, 05:21 PM)bfine32 Wrote: There have already been ships attacked in the Straight. Granted there is conflicting reports if Iran did it or not, but we know with certainty they didn't attack themselves. We are flying drones over the straight to safeguard other ships from suffering the same fate and a known enemy shoots them down and your option is "send them a bill". 

Hey we might agree on the send a bill stance, we might just disagree on the method of delivery. Personally I think a "don't shot down anymore of our shit" ultimatum should be given instead of armed conflict, but I couldn't find too much fault if we decided to a retaliatory strike. After all they threw the first stone; target is secondary. But none of this changes my original question on what do we do if this continues to happen and your answer was send a bill.   

Why isn't backing out the the JCPOA and collapsing Iran's economy (while they were keeping their word) throwing the first stone?


Those ships didn't attack themselves--and they weren't our ships.

Now that we have thrown a rock at the hornets nest, we must protect bystanders from the results?