07-10-2019, 05:58 PM
(07-10-2019, 05:52 PM)Vas Deferens Wrote: b/c it was an afront to justice and he has ties to a firm that played a role in all of it.
The first point, while true, is not germane to my question. To the second, he was an attorney in a firm that defended Epstein or he personally defended Epstein or what?
Quote:i thought you were concerned that it wasn't just acosta?
Concerned? I pointed out it could not have just been Acosta, that's not concern, that's a statement of fact.
Quote:never got an answer about who exactly you think directed the cover up,
If you had read my responses you would have. I flat out stated it likely went all the way to the AG at the time.
Quote:but wouldn't you at least want to have any investigation not tarnished yet again?
Absolutely. Given the heightened level of interest I don't think that's very likely, if possible at all. In any event, it is also demonstrable fact that Barr wasn't the AG at that time nor was he working in the DOJ. Still, I'll wait for more information as to why Barr should recuse himself before forming an opinion.
