07-26-2019, 11:03 AM
(07-26-2019, 10:04 AM)GMDino Wrote: 1. Well if we had better people in office in the first place I think we could severely limit such things as the Iraq War.
2. I would propose that breaking laws is different than second guessing why we went into an unnecessary war. That such a thing as going after a former POTUS for anything has never happened I'm going to chalk it up to politics and protecting your (universal) own side at all costs.
3. I find the cost too high.
1. Do you think we should employ another method of electing political figures other than a general election? Maybe one only for those who know who are the "better people".
2. I think it's more of a respect for the office and the magnitude of decision required to be made. To be honest before Trump I cannot think of another instance where former POTUS's condemned a sitting President. Be it for good or bad the office used to come with a since of respect. We can argue until we're blue in the face who is the cause of that, but the mystic in eroding.
3. The cost of what?
![[Image: bfine-guns2.png]](https://i.ibb.co/YBkDQJV/bfine-guns2.png)
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)