War with Iran?

[Dill]

(07-30-2019, 12:32 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: The UK seized a ship that was violating existing EU sanctions as it was bound for Syria.  This had nothing to do with the Iran deal and I literally pointed that out in the post you just quoted.  Please actually read what is written instead of immediately vomiting up a response as constantly reiterating the same points to you is annoying.

???
The British claimed the Iranian ship was violating EU sanctions on Syria. But the head of the EU Council on Foreign Relations says the EU does not impose EU sanctions on non members. So why seize a non EU ship? Spanish claim Britain was acting under US instructions to squeeze Iran's economy, to force it to a new Iran Deal. How would Britain defend against that charge in the UN International Court of Justice? https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/jul/20/gulf-crisis-tanker-retaliation-iran-hormuz

Not surprisingly, Iran views seizure of the tanker at Gibraltar as a violation of the JCPOA, which the EU claims it wants to uphold. And so seizes a British tanker in response to what it perceives as British Piracy. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/07/crisis-talks-iran-nuclear-deal-set-kick-vienna-190728072008700.html

So where did you "literally point out" that the Gibraltar seizure had nothing to do with the Iran Deal? This claim?

So, actually, the Iranian piracy is a response to something that has zero to do with the US and its reimposed sanctions.

That looks to be factually wrong. 

I also find your "constantly reiterating the same points" annoying. Especially when I and my sources have already made them. In the future, substitute repetition with support/evidence.