Weather and Climate change

[Dill]

(08-07-2019, 06:33 PM)JustWinBaby Wrote: I found the article after some searching.  My original point stands - what does that article have to do with anything I posted?  It's a strawman rebuttal.

Well this was your "original point":

"Also, would you please tell me what you think that article disproves that I have said?  I only get an abstract, the rest is behind a paywall and "no evidence for globally coherent warm and cold periods" doesn't sound like the article you're referring to."

The team of five scientists who undertook the study concluded this:

"we find that the warmest period of the past two millennia occurred during the twentieth century for more than 98 per cent of the globe. This provides strong evidence that anthropogenic global warming is not only unparalleled in terms of absolute temperatures5, but also unprecedented in spatial consistency within the context of the past 2,000 years."

Have you NOT been disputing that global warming is 1) "unparalleled" in the last 100 years, AND 2) that it is anthropogenic? Strawman rebuttal how?

Although Breech has been begging you for at least one, Beaker's link is the only actual study so far cited on this thread. Sounds like you only read the title of that study and could not make the connection, or read the abstract but did not understand it, and then could not immediately access a science database. A bad look for someone who claims that I "continue to fundamentally misunderstand how science works" and urges virtually everyone else to "educate themselves" on "climate alarmism"--by googling, no less.