08-12-2019, 05:02 PM
(08-12-2019, 04:52 PM)Dill Wrote: I'm not on the conspiracy bandwagon yet, but it's not an unreasonable jump.
This has to be the most high-profile suicide-prone federal prisoner in decades, with the power to finger some very high ranking politicians. He tries to kill himself, then in a few weeks he's "ok"? Sure. Stick him in a room with no cameras. (They're expensive.)
That others might be highly motivated to kill Epstein is not "proof," but it does beg investigation.
I don't think every suicide merits investigation. I do think hiring another inmate to kill him could be the most risky and least successful way to kill someone as closely watched as Epstein. A "suicide" which is successful on the second attempt can be defended/ambiguated much more easily.
Or so it seems. Maybe not. We'll see. Perhaps.
Not sure he is the most high profile suicide prone prisoner in decades, this is just sensationalism because of the results. If he had all those high ranking names to point to wouldn't that give him leverage for a "club fed" stay? The likely story, which has played out many times, is guy in position of power who realizes he is done for takes the cowards way out. For him to come off suicide watch it was signed off on by a doctor treating him, I think they are probably more in tune with his psychological state than us. Here is the funny part about this, if the doctor says he showed no suicidal signs then people will say that's proof he was killed, if they say he showed signs but didn't think it was serious enough to warrant watch people will say the fact the removed him is proof he was killed. Literally no matter what he investigation shows people are already decided it was a hit job carried out by deep state/Clinton's/Trump/ whoever else.
As for cameras expense, privacy rights, whatever they just don't put them in cells. This isn't unique to that facility. The fact people think they magically just can go in is kind of comical if you have ever worked through the government purchasing process.
