NRA Was 'Foreign Asset' To Russia Ahead of 2016, New Senate Report Reveals

[GMDino]

(10-03-2019, 11:33 AM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: A deliberately incorrect statement, as explained above.



No, anything that infringes on our rights is unacceptable.  This is further compounded by the fact that there are laws in place that are not being aggressively enforced that would actually make an impact.


Yes, I'm sure Vox, Vice and The Daily Beast are telling you exactly that. 

(10-03-2019, 11:33 AM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: Regardless, the Constitution is not subject to the whims and vagaries of the public. 

https://www.history.com/topics/roaring-twenties/prohibition

https://www.ourdocuments.gov/doc.php?flash=false&doc=63

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thirteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution

https://www.annenbergclassroom.org/resource/our-constitution/constitution-chapter-4-constitution-changed-time/

(10-03-2019, 11:33 AM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: Tell you what, I'll support a national registry if it comes attached to a Constitutional amendment that plainly states that no confiscation or mandatory buyback of any kind will ever be allowed and that anyone in public office advocating for such will be immediately removed from office and declared unfit to ever hold public office again.  Deal?

(10-03-2019, 11:33 AM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: Regardless, the Constitution is not subject to the whims and vagaries of the public.