10-03-2019, 04:41 PM
(10-03-2019, 10:33 AM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: Also, said universal background checks would require a national database of owned firearms to be enacted. Such a database could then be used in the future by Dems like Robert Francis, Biden and Warren who are openly campaigning, to varying degrees, on the confiscation of legally purchased private property.
A gun registry has zero to do with confiscation laws. This speaking point is a total red herring.
Confiscation laws will be passed even if there is no gun registry. There is no connection between the two. The fact that a gun registry could assist confiscation is also meaningless because if confiscation laws are passed the anyone who did not comply would be a criminal.
So complaining about a gun registry being used to enforce confiscation laws is just arguing for the protection of criminals.
A gun registry would do a world of good in enforcing the laws some people act like they want to see enforced. The fact that it could be used in the future for confiscation is no reason to avoid the good it could do now.
