The Abortion Question

[Brownshoe]

(10-06-2015, 06:08 PM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: If someone is dead, but still an individual why would you use the opposite of death to establish individualism when their individuality is independent of their death?  Why would you say something is a separate entity when it would die within moments if not connected to an umbilical cord for life support?


Your answer to #2 . . .

Because once someone is dead their not an individual anymore.

So you're saying that the fetus is a person? Why wouldn't it he the most basic of rights then? Why wouldn't it have the right to live? Just because we can't prevent its death doesn't mean that it's not a individual.