10-07-2015, 03:36 AM
(10-07-2015, 02:54 AM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: I most certainly did not leave it out. It's right there in post #360.
http://www.svss-uspda.ch/pdf/brain_waves.pdf
"Why is the law like that then? What logic is behind the law to make it the way it is if that's not the case?" How about you explain these questions like I asked?
Did you read that? She dismisses any kind of electrical waves from the brain because "brainwaves are a nontechnical term". There were multiple times in that paper where she would show that there is "brainwaves", but dismiss it because she wanted to.
brain·wave
ˈbrānˌwāv/
noun
an electrical impulse in the brain.
you should go back and look at my post, so you can see what you left out.
BTW there is another book by Rhawn Joseph, Ph.D. called "Fetal brain & cognitive development" that says that there is brain activity about ~7 weeks after conception. So I was wrong by 1 week according to Dr Rhawn Joseph.
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)