10-17-2019, 04:25 PM
(10-17-2019, 03:24 PM)Au165 Wrote: Why, would it make them less likely to serve?
Because you're opening up the door for the family and service staff of our ambassadors to be indicted on whatever crime a country chose the minute the came home. Yeah, that wouldn't make anyone reluctant at all.
Quote:If the wife got on the freeway today in the U.S. and killed someone she'd stand trial for it.
So would her husband.
Quote:I'm not trying to pin anything on anyone, I am telling you she has no legal protections and there is no precedent to set as it's not changing any interpretation of immunity.
Except there absolutely is as already explained. You disagree, that's fine, we can stop the back and forth.
Quote: If a tourist did the same thing in the UK and came home we'd send them back.
You state this as a definite when it is far, far from that.
Quote:She was not performing any duty when she killed the kid and she has no legal reason not be sent back. This isn't a political persecution issue by a foreign government it is serving justice for someone who was wronged.
Fine, we'll send her back after they send McKinnon our way. Sound good? She can't receive a fair trial in the UK now anyways with all the media attention this case has received. See how that works?
