11-01-2019, 06:04 PM
(11-01-2019, 04:43 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Your example is a false equivalence as a person who buys a speaker from you they are not forcing you to use your intellectual property to promote a message for them. Your example would make sense if the owner refused to sell them blank T-Shirts for fear they would write "gay things" on them.
Why should intellectual property be treated different from other property?
If your business is to provide a product what difference does it make if it is intellectual property or not. What is it about intellectual property that makes it okay to discriminate based on religion?
And if the customer provides the design there is no intellectual property involved at all.
