T-Shirt Company Sued

[*bfine32*]

(11-05-2019, 08:49 AM)Belsnickel Wrote: Your question has been answered several times in this thread and you have chosen to ignore it. Your response has been the court's position, which was that the organization did not have the statutory authority to claim discrimination and bring the case and was not that no one was discriminated against as you claim. This has also been explained several times.

What was the Appeals Court verdict and did the SC rule against it?

If folks would spend less time worrying about he. Calling me dishonest, homophobic, obtuse, troll, ect.. and looked at the case with their emotions checked at the door they may be able to understand why the Appeals Court ruled as it did and why the SC threw it out because "no one" brought suit saying they were discriminated against. I know earlier I called that a technicality looking for middle ground on the SC ruling; however, none was afforded. Sp let's call it a rule of law. 

But let's stop all of the arguing the position of posters and answer the simple question.

In your unbiased opinion was anyone discriminated against in this case because of sexual orientation?