T-Shirt Company Sued

[Belsnickel]

(11-05-2019, 11:39 AM)bfine32 Wrote: What was the Appeals Court verdict and did the SC rule against it?

If folks would spend less time worrying about he. Calling me dishonest, homophobic, obtuse, troll, ect.. and looked at the case with their emotions checked at the door they may be able to understand why the Appeals Court ruled as it did and why the SC threw it out because "no one" brought suit saying they were discriminated against. I know earlier I called that a technicality looking for middle ground on the SC ruling; however, none was afforded. Sp let's call it a rule of law. 

But let's stop all of the arguing the position of posters and answer the simple question.

In your unbiased opinion was anyone discriminated against in this case because of sexual orientation?

There is really no such thing as an unbiased opinion. But my opinion is that yes, there was discrimination against the GSM community. I've already stated that in this thread with my first post. The SC ruled there was no statutory standing for the organization to bring the case, meaning the organization cannot claim discrimination under the law not that they were not discriminated against.

Believe me, this isn't provoking an emotional response for me. This is the law. I can't claim to be unbiased but I am quite literally reading the words of the ruling.