11-05-2019, 02:39 PM
(11-05-2019, 12:22 PM)bfine32 Wrote: You give your opinion that a "community" was discriminated against and then point to the ruling that states a "community" cannot claim discrimination.
As usual we'll just disagree and I'll disengage before I say something personal (that shit would get me suspended) So we have both the SC and the Appeals court ruling against the plaintiff, but we're still rolling with someone was discriminated against.
Not being discriminated against and not being able to claim discrimination under the statute are two different things. I can be discriminated against for being fat but that doesn't make it illegal or allow me any financial recourse when a theater has tiny seats. I get told to lose some weight and shut up. Discrimination still occurred, but that doesn't mean there is a legal case. Not too difficult of a concept.
"A great democracy has got to be progressive, or it will soon cease to be either great or a democracy..." - TR
"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." - FDR
"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." - FDR
