T-Shirt Company Sued

[*bfine32*]

(11-05-2019, 03:39 PM)GMDino Wrote: Are we gonna shift gears and say the shop owner wasn't claiming the "pride in a sin" defense and go to he thinks being gay is unhealthy?

Does his religion prevent him from supporting anything he sees as unhealthy?

This is getting so ridiculous.

What was a simple matter of a case being turned down because a group filed it rather than the individual who was denied services is now a feces twister to defend religious people discriminating against anyone they want of they can prove it is "against" their religion.

The basic concept of "treat your neighbor as you would treat yourself" is so lost on the "religious" it makes me glad people don't think I'm religious any more.

No I was simply drawing relevance to Matt's example. My stance has remained unchanged since my original thoughts on the matter. The lower court ruled for the plaintiffs, the higher court ruled for the defendant, the highest court rejected it because the discrimination rules do not apply ro a group. 

But I do agree it has gotten ridiculous and has degraded into petty name-calling by some.