T-Shirt Company Sued

[fredtoast]

(11-05-2019, 04:44 PM)bfine32 Wrote: but they worded it in the one little phrase you are clinging to because of this:


the


determination would have to follow whether the reason for denial of service constitutes discrimination under the ordinance

and then whether the local government was attempting to compel expression, had
infringed on religious liberty, or had failed to carry its burden under KRS
446.350. But without an individual, as required by Section 2-32(2)(a),
this analysis cannot be conducted. Our decision, based on lack of
standing,is necessary because without a proper complainant,
no determination can be made as to whether the ordinance was violated.

 

So tell me again what the court said about whether or not anyone was discriminated against.  Specifically pull out the quote where they MADE THE DETERMINATION that no one was discriminated against.