Jeffrey Epstein Arrest

[GMDino]

(12-04-2019, 11:56 AM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: In response to your lame pseudo-insults, yes.  But be honest for a change, anyone who disagrees with you is a Trump supporter in your eyes, so this statement is hardly a surprise.  You try so hard to label people with that accusation that I'm surprised you haven't had a stroke.

Oooooo, attacking someone for having a vocabulary.  Someone got cranky posting in the wee hours.  As stated before Epstein knew virtually everyone at the high levels of power/society.  Posting a picture of him with anyone proves nothing on its own.  I also said I'd vote for him as opposed to Sanders or Warren, but would vote third party before any of them.  So, once again, you flat out lie in your attempts to label people.  You are as dishonest as you are vapid.

Again it's not "having a vocabulary" it is that there is no defense so it's attack the poster and simply deny it has even happened.

(12-04-2019, 11:56 AM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: I will point out when someone is making a fallacious argument.  As you seem to be in the business of producing them I call you out a lot.  As you are set against Trump in a pathological sense it stands to reason that in refuting your inanity I will be refuting anti-Trump statements.  Logic, look into it.

In this case it's your obsession with Trump.  I have said many uncomplimentary things about Trump.  I honestly find him laughable.  I also won't just stare at the word vomit you force upon us daily and just zone out and move on.  It might be my profession, but when I see something that's wrong I try and right it.

With all due respect that is BS.  I have shown that I am open to actual facts and willing to change my mind and admit if I am wrong.  They would need to be offered though.  And they are not.  Opinions are being used to "dispute".

What is going on is not "logic" (look into it) it is a knee-jerk response that contains nothing of actual substance from people who find they must find a way to say maybe Trump isn't *quite* as bad as everything known about him suggests.

To say one would vote for a proven conman and fraud for any reason is enough to put them in the Trump defenders camp.  

Every person within Trump's orbit who has been found to be dirty or shady or convicted Trump "barely knows" "can't remember meeting" etc.  Epstein is just one example.

But then if we can't all agree what Stephen Miller is then maybe we can't all be honest about what Trump is no matter how many facts are presented and how many truths are told.

(12-04-2019, 11:56 AM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: Oh, I have no doubt you'll continue to be the same person who arrived in P&R defending a guy who tried to kill a cop.  You, GA9, Lucie, Dabo, Sloppy, no one expects you to change so no need to state you won't.

And the defense rests.