Impeachment Hearings

[*bfine32*]

(12-16-2019, 02:51 PM)hollodero Wrote: 1. So, that's the key difference then. Meaning, the Barron scandal was actually worse than POTUS insulting Greta Thunberg. Do I read that correctly, since that key difference aside, it is "much as"...?

Of course I still argue ridiculing and insulting a child is actually way worse than bringing up a child's name and then apologizing for it, but these differences don't seem to be key to you.



2. Case in point, you argue both childs were "insulted". Strange to me, since I do not think mentioning that Trump has a son named Barron is actually any kind of insult. Why is it an insult?

1. No where did I say the Barron sandal was worse; simply mentioned how each became a subject. So your pro bono psycho-analysis is off the mark

2. Both were made a subject of discussion that I felt is best left to adults. Nothing more, nothing less. Trump should not have insulted Greta winning the Time cover and the professor should not have introduced Barron into the impeachment hearings.