01-06-2020, 01:51 PM
(01-06-2020, 01:09 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Let me help you out with the similarity: I think there are very few who do not think dude deserved to swallow a missile, most are now concerned about escalating into war. Just like they were concerned about it happening after the Hormuz incident.
But to add to the atrocity which was eliminating the head of a terrorist organization that has killed and plan to kill innocent Americans. I've noe learned it was racist:
https://twitter.com/Kaepernick7/status/1213553331181764608?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1213553331181764608&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fthehill.com%2Fhomenews%2Fmedia%2F476902-megyn-kelly-criticizes-kaepernick-for-iran-tweet-because-everything-is-racist
Being concerned has various levels, hence why I asked if we assassinated a general during that incident you are referencing or if we got ejected from a neighboring country within days because of said referenced incident. I can be concerned I'll be audited for having a $500 dollar write off to good will on my taxes and I can be concerned I'll be audited for having a $5,000,000 dollar write off to good will, both are concerns but there are circumstances that make those concern substantially different.
Also, if he was appointed to that role by the head of Iran how is he the head of the organization? If the Iranian leader can now appoint another head of the Royal Revolutionary Guard, doesn't that technically make him the head of the organization? By the logic you applied, can we just drone strike Hassan Rouhani?
