Iran Situation

[*bfine32*]

(01-09-2020, 11:09 AM)Belsnickel Wrote: So, what is being said is that they were not shown evidence of an imminent threat/danger. A lack of evidence of an imminent threat would mean, logically, that there was not an imminent threat.

Have you been shown evidence of an imminent threat?

Would you say there was no imminent threat?

2 members of the GOP spoke out against the quality of the briefing they received. They felt information was not shared freely with them. Neither indicated there was no imminent threat; as was suggested. Perhaps there were reasons the briefing was generic in terms. Who knows maybe Booker would feel that another Spartacus moment was required to make him relevant again.

I think you know what was suggested by Benton was not accurate, but I expect no one to concede so I'll let it lie (pun intended)