Iran Situation

[BmorePat87]

(01-09-2020, 04:33 PM)bfine32 Wrote: There's no moving the goalpost there is a logical fallacy in place known as "argumentum ad ignorantiam"

Person A: "What did you think of the briefing"

Person B: "It was terrible in content, they spoke in generalizations and failed to share specifics that constituted the POTUS' actions"

Person A: "Person B feels there was nothing to support POTUS' actions"

It's taking an absence of information (ignorance) and using it to draw a conclusion where none was given.

I'll accept responsibility for being overly abrasive in a few of my retorts, but there is no intellectual dishonesty (on my part), moving the goalpost, or focus on semantics. It was simply pointing something asserted that was not.

Wow, lol. I only have myself to blame for engaging you in good faith.