01-14-2020, 09:48 AM
(01-14-2020, 02:08 AM)Benton Wrote: I saw Matt share a wsj opinion. I didn't see Matt guess.
But, sure.
Not even opinion; it was their reporting on the events that occurred. Now, they didn't explain it in the terms I did, but I made the logical inference. Though it should be noted that the WSJ mentioned the impeachment, not myself. I just stuck with the broader "personal political gain." You know this stuff, though.
Personally, I have no idea what was going on in Trump's head when he gave the order. So much reporting has shown that the administration is shifting in their explanations and isn't very forthcoming on details. That combined with Trump's typical unpredictability and self-serving approach to public service, makes anything possible. My main questions have been surrounding the criminality of the act.
"A great democracy has got to be progressive, or it will soon cease to be either great or a democracy..." - TR
"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." - FDR
"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." - FDR
