01-15-2020, 06:48 PM
(01-15-2020, 06:04 PM)Dill Wrote: It's also defined by what the other side perceives as intent, not to mention the international community. China would very likely consider a bomb strike an act of war--even if it could be construed as an accident.
It's also defined by power. The US dropped more tons of bombs on helpless Cambodia than on Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan, killing upwards of 50,000 "neutral" Cambodian civilians. But "secretly"; Nixon never considered that a declaration of war on Cambodia, though the international community and a large number of Americans considered it an act of war.
US citizens need to watch their own government closely wherever it resorts to lethal force.
Why do we insist on making things up? I provided the legal definition of Act or War and nowhere does it mention the things you and Fred are adding.
Was it illegal? Quite possibly.
Was it an Act of War? No
![[Image: bfine-guns2.png]](https://i.ibb.co/YBkDQJV/bfine-guns2.png)
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)
