Impeachment Hearings

[*bfine32*]

(01-17-2020, 02:17 PM)hollodero Wrote: Sure thing.
My problem is, I saw the case presented in the house and it seems compelling. That can change in theory, just as of now I have not even seen an attempt of a defense. Maybe there is one, and maybe it contains valid and truthful points, I will see.
Forgive me for having doubts though. The first attempt of a "defense" in the house was embarrassing. And I have trouble seeing an angle how this Ukraine extortion story that was corroborated many times can change. But there sure is space enough to try.



Yeah I didn't talk about any of that, so I don't know why you throw that at me. I specifically talked about something else, twice.
But since you'd rather talk about those things: I deem the things you complain about here pretty irrelevant.



Maybe so. It just happens that one side pretty much tells the truth and the other side pretty much tells lies. Any attempt of a defense is free to point out when the Dems did not tell the truth in some substantial matter. You're free to do so as well.
Just, don't answer with slamming "somber walks" please.



Well, yes. It is more atrocious.
Those Dems you mention at least have facts they base their opinion on. Graham has nothing of that sort.
But sure, said Dems should have kept their mouths shut as well.

The Defense has present no evidence/ witnesses yet so that's most likely why you haven't seen anything yet.

You didn't speak of those things; however, you did speak directly of the "behavior" of both sides and how one was superior to the other, so I thought it might be relevant to bring up their behavior.

The Dems I speak of had 0 facts before a big chunk started crying "Impeach".