01-21-2020, 06:29 PM
(01-21-2020, 06:09 PM)fredtoast Wrote: PFF individual player ratings are 100% based on subjective grading. Look it up.
PFF keeps track of some stats that can be very helpful, but I guarantee that no team relies on their individual player ratings. For example PFF said Andy Dalton was better in 2018 than his amazing 2015 season. And this year they claim Auden Tate was a better player than Sam Hubbard who led all DEs in tackles and was top 10 in sacks.
I agree Hubbard plays way better than his rating and I agree that PFF isn't always right. I think the main point of the OP was that for a team that relies so heavy on the draft the amount of high impact players is low. Some of the names listed don't make up for Tobin's misses. Like naming a kicker we cut as a good draft pick When you miss in early rounds you need later round players to step up and have more of an impact to make up for an overall lack of talent on the roster, considering we don't use free agency. Boyd, Hubbard and Mixon play above average and are some of the few young building blocks we have. Guys like Uzomah, Glasgow, Brown, Tate , Fej ect. are backup/ end of the roster players and I think we can all agree we don't need PFF to tell us that.
