Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Hobsons choice: no need to invest more in the offensive line?
#55
(02-07-2020, 03:05 PM)Yojimbo Wrote: The two biggest excuses are, “they got better” and “6th in the league in rushing over the second half of the season”. Adressing the first, when you are the worst you have nowhere to go but “better”. To the second, I’ve heard this excuse from the Bengals multiple times at multiple different position groups and players. Being middle of the pack or top 10 or whatever does not mean it’s okay to rest on your laurels. The goal should always, ALWAYS, be #1. That is the only time the status quo is okay.

That or they’ll just name every unproven guy on the roster and say he might develop. Jordan might be good , Fred Johnson who was undrafted might be good, We resigned Bobby Hart , Pratt might be a good LB and we could draft one who also might be good. We signed Isiah Prince. We singed a CFL cornerback he might develop. There plan is basically to hope every unproven player might turn out to be good. Or Hobson acts like because Michael Jordan started he must have played good and beat out good competition to win a staring job. He started because we had no other options ,Jordan was basically are 4th option. Our 1st round pick Price couldn’t beat out a 20 year old rookie because he’s a bust, Boling retired , Redmond who’s also a bum was suspended for steroids and Glenn moved back to tackle.
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Hobsons choice: no need to invest more in the offensive line? - lone bengal - 02-07-2020, 04:53 PM
Investment in offensive line - fredtoast - 02-10-2020, 02:45 PM
RE: Investment in offensive line - Nati#1 - 02-11-2020, 12:10 AM
RE: Investment in offensive line - Joelist - 02-11-2020, 02:18 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)