Teaching Fake News

[Dill]

(03-02-2020, 06:41 AM)JustWinBaby Wrote: Any time you want to debate climate science, you're welcome to try.  Every one of those arguments ends the same way they began "but but but you can't prove the earth isn't warming".  Sounds a lot like the programmed response of idiots.  I can't teach you how to model, but I did show you why the climate modeling is garbage in, garbage out.   Don't lecture me on critical thinking when you're incapable of it.

But I know you don't actually have a degree in math....or statistics....or science....or climate.....Because if you did you'd debate with actual science, as opposed to ad-hominem attacks.  Actually, if you had those degrees you'd wouldn't even be arguing because you'd agree with me.  But to be fair, AOC has a degree in economics so maybe I'm being naive.

edit: I'm not a "denier".  Anyone who calls me that is ignorant. If you don't even know what an R-sq is then shut the **** up.

"AOC" ...what..?  Random much? 

Lets start with some of that critical thinking.
1. You claim if I had a degree "math....or statistics....or science....or climate...." I'd agree with you.  
2. But thousands of climate scientists with degrees in "math....or statistics....or science....or climate...."--90%+-- don't agree with you.
So where is the warrant for "1"?   

And no, you haven't "shown" anyone that "climate modeling is garbage in, garbage out." You've basically claimed that, then ignored the deconstruction of those claims, and disappeared, only to pop up again months later, quoting Forbes and the WJS, and claiming people who disagree are just programmed by Huffpost. 

The pattern is--you keep locating your differences with others in their supposed deficiencies (ad hominem), while they address your arguments as arguments, and find them wanting, especially in comprehension of how science works.  A sampling of posts explaining science to you:

Stewy #16, #17 & #19 (a follow up post on Geoscientific method)  "GOOD NEWS, EVERYONE !! (Ozone Layer)" 
Hollo # 61 & #67 "The Alt Right Hails its Victorious God Emperor" 12/18/16 & 12/22/16 respectively
Hollo # 49 & #52  "Hey Look It's a Climate Change Thread" 1/20/17 & 2/27/17 respectively
Beaker # 15 "Climate Change Deniers"  11/11/17
Dill #70 "The Alt Right Hails its Victorious God Emperor"

Which thread was it that Breech called you out for refusing to post studies you claimed to know, because that would be "proving a negative"?

Most recently your "conscious intellectualism" was on display on the "Weather and Climate Change" thread, where you actually began posting links for support.  But primarily blogs and newspaper articles, so once again, Breech was begging you to post at least one of the "studies" you claimed to know. Beaker was again explaining and refuting like a good science teacher. But start with post #81 (8/07/19), where I helped you over some confusions about an article from NATURE entitled "No Evidence for Globally Coherent Warm and Cold Periods over the Pre industrial Common Era." (You could not follow the abstract.) And I PM'd you the entire article when you could not access any of the science databases which carry NATURE. How much time did I spend vetting your sources on that thread, starting with Roy Spencer (who endorses intelligent design) and ending with Judith Curry (who doesn't support your position at all)? #82

So where is your memory? You've not done well at all with climate science debates in this forum. Assert, insult, repeat, disappear. That's been your method.