10-14-2015, 11:21 AM
(10-14-2015, 11:13 AM)Benton Wrote: I'll be surprised if it's not overturned during an appeal. Without proof the store knew the sale was for someone else, they should not be held liable.
On the other hand, if it's correct that four years prior "537 guns recovered from crimes were traced back to Badger Guns" then someone should have been checking into the place more.
I can't see this standing.
Also the law passed in 2005? I wonder if the police unions fought that one. It would seem counter-productive to catching criminals. Especially if, as you noted, those numbers about that business are correct.
![[Image: giphy.gif]](https://media0.giphy.com/media/1kwsTjL8BNqlszNtnCE/giphy.gif)
Your anger and ego will always reveal your true self.
