04-05-2020, 03:58 PM
(04-04-2020, 05:42 PM)McC Wrote: How much time do you really want to spend arguing what maybe used to be but is no longer? What exactly is the point? Does it in any way prove Burrow should not be the pick? HELL NO.
All we need is a time machine in your scenario. And for the life of me, I can't understand why you're even making this argument.
Simple... no way Burrow came into last year as a Manning or a Luck, he was not even mentioned in 1st round at times a 2nd round pick... It is hard to go back in time and think of another QB that has went from somewhat obsure to #1 pick.. yes he has moved to #1 QB pick at same time some think there is no way you can;t draft him over trading back and adding either Herbert or Tua... I don't understand the other side of the argument that you can;t look at the other QBs plus what else you can get with extra picks.. I am not putting Burrow as an untouchable #1 and I am not alone out there with those that study and understand football better than us as a whole. So if we trade him and still get a top flight QB and extra picks that add to this team I can understand. If the Bengals decide his value is better than what is offered than ok..
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)
