05-08-2020, 09:35 PM
(05-08-2020, 09:20 PM)Belsnickel Wrote: Answer to the first: no. I saw no mention of this in the documents.
Answer to the second: no. The writer posits which is urgent, the truth or getting him to lie. The same notes say the purpose is to resolve the case and see if he will lie.
Guess we'll see as more is uncovered. I just take issue with dismissing the acts because "he admitted it".
We'll have to see how Strozk's question of How should we answer if Flynn asks of "do I need a lawyer" is answered. Seems like a silly question to ask in America. Who know's maybe the answer was "of course you should seek counsel before answering our questions", but reports indicate otherwise.
Apologies they asked was it urgent to get him to lie, not the goal. The handwritten notes seem to indicate which way they were leaning.
![[Image: bfine-guns2.png]](https://i.ibb.co/YBkDQJV/bfine-guns2.png)
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)