So what’s next?

[hollodero]

(06-06-2020, 03:46 PM)bfine32 Wrote: 1. Nah, I'm just talking about those that assert a way ahead is to replace Trump; instead of focusing on the issue. I've said Trump's walk deseved condemnation so I've said something bad about Trump

Indeed exactly as I said. You leave that one "acceptable" Trump critizism open, just to keep appearances. But this is not an honest way to lead the debate.

As said, sure you can disagree, but the way you do that is just obnoxious. For the matter at hand, I find it quite reasonable to believe voting out Trump is a positive step. There are several reasons given, that are not shameful to give. If you think differently, (more or less) fine. If you think differently and call others all kinds of names for not sharing your take, not fine.

(06-06-2020, 03:46 PM)bfine32 Wrote: 2. https://www.yahoo.com/news/mainstream-reporters-falsely-accuse-trump-181407447.html

I give you that one, you have a fair point here. To me, it still is quite tasteless though, his mentioning Floyd as having a great day because everything is just hunky dory. But disagreement on that point is not the issue.

(06-06-2020, 03:46 PM)bfine32 Wrote: 3. I provided you with a clear example of what you considered me "making shit up". Now you're free to move the goalpost and say "well that's not good enough, but I think we can both clearly see I made nothing up.

Being unsensical (as in using undue inductive conclusions) is making shit up. As would be associating you with something a Breitbart user says, or anyone else I just deem anti-liberal just like you.
In reality, just like all cops are not the same, not all Trump critics are the same and the principle of "show one is wrong once, then you showed all are wrong all the time" does not apply. Not that I even think Nately was wrong in the example you gave, but the principle itself is flawed.

(06-06-2020, 03:46 PM)bfine32 Wrote: 4. Without counting do you want to bet Trump's name shows up more than the killer's in this thread.

That does not prove anything. Maybe there's not much to say about the killer in addition to what a heineous killer he is. Trump is the person in power though, whose reactions and deeds matter now and matter most now. How often he comes up proves nothing about malicious intent from Trump critics.
If he were to give the cop a medal of honor and called him an american hero, his name would come up even more and it would not prove that he is unfairly treated. Your point is flawed.

(06-06-2020, 03:46 PM)bfine32 Wrote: 5. I've never said nothing is Trump's fault. I've said he's no more to blame than Obama. What was that you were saying about making shit up

You relentlessly attack all those that have a different take though. You call them akin to looters and shameful and whatnot. I have no problem with your take (though I vigorously disagree in that instance), but the way you express it is horrible.

As for said disagreement, I think president Obama would handle the situation way more gracefully, inclusive and in a way more healing and unifying matter. Just my take. (Dill expanded on that way more eloquently then I ever could.)