They're coming for your guns

[*bfine32*]

(07-11-2020, 04:45 PM)fredtoast Wrote: It was just taken as evidence as part of an investigation.  If there are no charges he will get it back.

It has nothing to od with keeping them from protecting their property.  It has to do with them not being reckless and injuring someone who was zero threat to them or their property.

Not one other person in that entire community pulled a weapon in public and there was zero property damage or injuries.  

I don't know enough about the story to know if these people should be charged with anything.  If they are not then they should get their guns back.

I'd consider anyone who broke into my private property to be a little more elevated than "zero threat".

WTS, why the warrant? Why not just say: We need you to surrender your firearm as part of an "investigation"?

To me the optics are bad. Folks break into their private property, they make themselves a "hard target", they get investigated and must surrender the device they use to protect themselves and their property. .