07-12-2020, 11:16 AM
(07-12-2020, 11:08 AM)bfine32 Wrote: https://www.foxnews.com/us/armed-st-louis-rioters-threatened-couple-guns-attorney
According to this the couple didn't immediately arm themselves. But we're to dismiss their account and roll with "It was not clear when it was damaged"
All of that and the fact remains; these folks entered private property by breaching a gate. Are you saying the smoking gun is whether they damaged the gate or not upon their trespass?
You asked this: Link to them breaking the gate to enter.
and 2 has been provided, both a picture and an eyewitness account.
The "eye witness" account is from an unreliable source. And an "eyewitness account" does not change video proof.
And, to me, the breaking of the gate could be a big deal. And I think it is a big deal to you also since you were the one who brought it up to prove that the protestors were a threat.
(07-12-2020, 10:11 AM)bfine32 Wrote: These folks broke down a gate and entered provate property yet you and other continue to label them as peaceful protestors.
