07-22-2020, 04:02 PM
(07-22-2020, 03:21 PM)Dill Wrote: Post #191
You have refuted a number of factual claims in your post #198, and SSF appears unable to contest, so I guess the refutations stand.
But I want to note the above exchange for a moment because it illustrates how pre-judgments get projected onto facts, so the judgments are then misrepresented as themselves factual because they about facts.
Claiming that the shooters in this case had "admitted to murder"--when the "proof" is merely that the shooters admitted to shooting--[b]is a clear example of injecting "opinion" into fact, and then "stating opinion as fact." [/b]
You keep doing you, Dill, no worries. I'm very confident that other people reading the thread will be able to discern what is factual and what is opinion. If you feel you need to get in the last word, that's ok, I'm used to that.
