Trump's Axios interview

[GMDino]

(08-08-2020, 02:47 AM)Dill Wrote: Questioning or refuting a bad counterargument is not the same as "allowing no counter argument." 

"Absolutists" who "brook no dissent" do not ask their opponents to clarify and offer more evidence for, or restate their points. And conversely, they don't opt out of dialogue when asked for evidence or to further explain their reasoning, or to demonstrate an understanding of their opponent's argument.

Avoiding such ordinary challenges of civil debate--that's what absolutists do who brook no dissent. They state their conclusions, and if they're feeling generous they may restate them once more, but then that's that. 

Your claims that Trumpism is dependent only on Trump's "presence" and that the Dem party poses a radical far left danger greater than four more years of Trump are at this point unsupportable. Their weakness has been laid out step by step, unanswered, in posts #45-46. Claiming I've made my point and you've made yours doesn't make this a "tie." 

Dill!  Stop asking people to clarify or defend what they say!  You must not understand "muh free speech"! 

All seriousness aside this thread was highlighting Trump's inability to think, speak or plan until it went of on.."but Biden" along with the usual semantic arguments (you said "people" instead of "biden supporters"!!!!11!!1!)

Its too funny.