08-26-2020, 01:36 PM
(08-26-2020, 01:31 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: It's America's new favorite past time, trial by social media. You do realize none of this indicates he is guilty of anything. We certainly don't know all the facts, but what if this kid is guilty of nothing more than defending himself from attackers? We've seen numerous examples of these riotous mobs attacking and severely beating people.
Also, if the "white militia members" weren't doing anything illegal, and in fact there's numerous examples of them protecting small businesses from being looted and burned, then why wouldn't the police treat them as law abiding citizens lending a hand?
https://www.newsweek.com/video-shows-armed-residents-protecting-local-businesses-rioters-kenosha-wi-1527496
What horrible people.
Now, if this kid went out and attacked people, and was not acting in self defense then he should be prosecuted to the fullest extent. But we don't know what happened yet, do we? Although it appears the two of you have already made up your mind.
Well, at the very least the kid is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor in Wisconsin. https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/948/60
"A great democracy has got to be progressive, or it will soon cease to be either great or a democracy..." - TR
"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." - FDR
"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." - FDR