09-07-2020, 03:39 PM
(09-07-2020, 11:04 AM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: fredtoast Wrote:Actually I can deny that. I do not remember any other Republican Candidates having to deal with their supporters getting attacked.
I don't remember any unusual violence until Trump came along with his KKK endorsements, racists attacks on Mexican immigrants, and followers proudly flying the Confederate flag at his rallies.
That's correct kids, if you attack someone just blame them for being something you don't like and that makes it their fault, not yours.[/b] Does it not bother you to make excuses for people engaged in politically motivated violence?
(09-07-2020, 02:05 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: fredtoast Wrote: Yes. Exactly. I used a factual example to prove the flaw in your logic.
Sure, Fred.
(09-07-2020, 11:04 AM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote:Fred's examples are logical, SSF's are faulty. Got it.
(09-07-2020, 11:04 AM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote:
Dill Wrote:Yes, Fred's examples are logical. And you couldn't refute his argument with a thousand emoticons.
A couple of keepers here.
The stronger the good faith arguments against your scattershot and ad hoc positions, the faster you lapse into bad faith non-arguments.
When it turns out, as it so often does, that you simply accuse others of what YOU are really doing (your superpower, remember!), you won't even risk a soundbite.
Hence the emoticons.