More "largely peaceful" Portland protests

[Sociopathicsteelerfan]

(09-08-2020, 03:49 PM)fredtoast Wrote: No they burnef an image of the governor but this is very similar under the law to the burning of a cross.

Without any other facts both would be protected symbolic speech. But if there is other evidence of an intent to cause fear or intimidation they can lead to criminal charges.

Isn't protesting outside someone's house the very definition of attempting to intimidate them?  Also, the key word is "can", not will or shall.  You're still ignoring the SCOTUS ruling btw.