09-21-2020, 06:19 PM
(09-21-2020, 06:15 PM)Mickeypoo Wrote: It is precedent that no SCOTUS has been confirmed when one party holds the White House and the other party holds the Senate. In that respect Garland was "normal practice".
What does the time frame matter? Is it legal and constitutional or not?
Out of this whole SCOTUS thing, what is illegal or unconstitutional? That's all that matters. Doesn't matter who says what, who agrees or disagrees, who thinks the other side is a big, orange, meanie, poopy pants. Non of that is relevant.
There is literally nothing to see here other than politicians being their normal douche bag selves on both sides.
That pretty much sums it up.
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)
