09-23-2020, 05:50 PM
(09-23-2020, 04:31 PM)PhilHos Wrote: By itself? Maybe not. But, you gotta admit, crying for impeachment before he's sworn in and then actually moving forward with impeachment sure does look shady, does it not?
I'd say no. In any case, the ones "crying for impeachment etc." are not the ones who actually brought impeachment charges.
What every voter ought to be looking at during an impeachment is whether evidence supports the charges. Same as a court case.
If there is evidence that someone accused of a bank robbery actually committed it, like a phone conversation and a video, then it matters not if the prosecutors had it in for the the robber before he robbed the back.
Nothing looks "shady" if the evidence is there.
In this case, the people who were crying for impeachment were so precisely because Trump's previous dishonest behavior made him unfit for office.
Why should that previous recognition of unfitness make the impeachment look "shady" when the charges show the warnings to be well founded?
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)
