A SCOTUS Opening

[*bfine32*]

(09-28-2020, 05:53 PM)bfine32 Wrote: You never showed me where Coney Barrett said Obama should nominate in his last year. Do you want to retract, show, or just leave the accusation out there. You know, Liberal decency and all.

I do agree that Biden is hypocritical in this as opposed to 2016, but I'm sure the decent Liberals will hold him accountable. Because they're just better all around people. 

(09-28-2020, 05:56 PM)jj22 Wrote: I don't get the lame Trump nonsupporterdefendersvotersdefenderssupporters argument in 2016 trying to turn it around on Dems. Democrats have all acknowledge they were fine with the POTUS nominating someone for SCOTUS in an election year (especially 10 months ahead of election) but Republican's changed the rules and now we should abide by them. Or at least those who changed them should. That's not a good argument as Democrats have already responded and 78% of Americans agree.

I've already sent the link and there are plenty discussions on her flip flop.

Guess we're going with the 3rd option. 

If the Libs were truly "better" that the Conservatives would they be trying to push the two wrongs make a right stance?

As to me: I thought Obama's candidate should have been vetted and I think Trump's candidate should be vetted, because as RBG put it "we elect them to serve 4 years" but I'm just a conservative, I don't always take the higher ground.