NEGATIVE REP

[*bfine32*]

(10-26-2015, 02:15 AM)Johnny Cupcakes Wrote: If agreeing with a post is grounds for reaping someone green, then why is disagreeing not grounds for replying someone red?  I'm not talking about disagreeing on whether Hill is gonna have a big game or if Breaking Bad is the best show of all time. I'm talking about legit disagreements when someone says some idiotic garbage.

I'm not going to go around red reaping everyone, agreement/disagreement and approval/disapproval are what the whole rep function is for....be it green or red.

Far more often, I'll use it as a joke, like I have thrice in this thread.

bfine32 Wrote:Whatever makes you happy I suppose. Just mentioning disagreeing with a post is not justification for the neg rep as the Mods described it. We can only hope it doesn't get abused